STUDIES OF CURRENT PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS IN BUILDING
Keywords:
Integrated Project Delivery, early involvement, IPD, construction projectAbstract
The research analyzes the core, characteristics and principles of theIntegrated Project Delivery (IPD) and establishes the connectionbetween it and the traditional project delivery methods. The IPDaccumulates some of their special features and becomes the nextstage in the evolution of the construction industry. One of the maincharacteristics of the IPD is an early involvement of key participants,based on the following principles: early involvement, early goaldefinition, intensified planning, and organization and leadership. Theaim of the research is to compare the effectiveness of the traditionalproject delivery methods and the IPD by the criterion of the total costfor project modification.References
D. Mosey. Early contractor involvement in building procurement: contracts, partnering and project management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2009.
The American Institute of Architects. Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide. 2007. URL: https://info.aia.org/SiteObjects/files/IPD_Guide_2007.pdf.
B. Jorgensen, S. Emmit. Investigating the integration of design and construction from a “lean” perspective. Construction Innovation, 9(2), 225-240, 2009.
NASFA, COAA, AHEFO, AGC, and AIA. Integrated Project Delivery for Public and Private Owners, 2010. URL: https://www.nsba.org/sites/default/files/file/03_xb_Powell_Keith_Discussion_Solicitations_Minutes_Cost_Sheet.pdf. 5. S. A. Rahim. “Unpublished Master Thesis”, UUM, 2015.
B. Hardin. BIM and construction management – proven tools, methods, and workflows. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, 2009.
W. Nofera, S. Korkmaz, V.D. Miller. Innovative features of integrated project delivery shaping project team
communication. The 2011 Engineering Project Organizations Conference. 2011.
T. Johnson, P. Feng, W. Sitzabee, M. Jernigan. Federal Acquisition Regulation Applied to Alliancing Contract Practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 139(5), 480–487, 2013.
P. Gultekin, S. Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, D. Riley, R. Leicht. Process Indicators to Track Effectiveness of High-Performance Green Building Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Vol 139, Issue 12, 1-8, 2013.
D.C. Kent, B. Becerik-Gerber. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 136(8), 815-825, 2010.
M. Hassan. Assessing the Impact of the Lean/Integrated Project Delivery System on Final Project Success. 2013. URL: http://digilib.gmu.edu/jspui/bitstream/handle/1920/8280 /Hassan_gmu_0883E_10276.pdf?sequence=1.
N. Azhar. Integrated Construction Project Delivery System in the U.S. Public Sector: An Information Modeling Framework. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1567, 2014.
B. C. Paulson. Designing to Reduce Construction Costs. Journal of the Construction Division. 102(C04), 588, 976.
P. MacLeamy. Integrated Project Delivery: McLeamy Curve. 2011. URL: http://www.msaipd.com MacleamyCurve.pdf.
J. Wilhelm. Target Innovation at Work: Collaboration Makes Construction. 2007. URL: http://www.ame.org/sites/default/files/target_articles/07-23-5-Collaboration.pdf.
