BUSINESS RELATION RISKS FOR AUDITOR AND CUSTOMER IN THE CONTEXT OF INDEPENDENCE: TRENDS IN FOREIGN RESEARCH

Authors

  • O. R. Antoniuk National University of Water and Environmental Engineering

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31713/ve120203

Keywords:

risk, independence, professional activity, interaction, audit services, non-audit services.

Abstract

The urgency of the issue in the context of the Law of Ukraine "On Auditof Financial Reporting and Auditing" is emphasized, since at the level of the legislative document the attention was paid to the observance of theindependence of the financial statements of public interest entities in thecontext of performing non-audit services. However, at present, the practical implementation of these provisions, as well as the work of the auditor in providing non-audit services to other categories of customers is not sufficiently considered. The purpose of the study is to analyze current trends in the development of various aspects of independence in the light of foreign experience, assess the possibility of application in Ukraine.The article deals with the risks that arise in the process of formingcontractual relations and in the course of providing non-audit services.Emphasis is placed on maintaining independence in the simultaneousprovision of audit and other services. The issue is addressed with a focus on the overseas experience of auditors’ theory and practice of professional performance in a historical context. The development of non-audit services in Ukraine requires the research and practical implementation of aspects of auditors’ professional behavior regarding their provision to audit clients.The foreign researches were analyzed: features of realization ofindependence observance in the process of rendering non-audit services for forming the auditor’s conclusions in the assessment of continuity; therelationship between auditor independence and the price of non-auditservices; the auditor’s independence in the process of providing taxservices. The article also raises the issue of quality control of the provision of non-audit services by professional organizations. Discussions about independence remain in the active phase, which should be of interest to Ukrainian auditors to take into account the global trends in audit activity and the specifics of their implementation in Ukraine. The directions of professional independence in the part of non-audit services are indicated.

Author Biography

O. R. Antoniuk, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering

Dосtor in Economics, Associate Professor

References

Bondar M. I. Rozvytok audytu v Ukraini. Rynok audytorskykh posluh v Ukraini: stan i perspektyvy rozvytku : zb. materialiv dopovidei Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Ivano-Frankivsk, 15-16 kvitnia 2010 r.). Ivano-Frankivsk, 2010. S. 145–147.

Zamula I. V., Levkivska O. Ya. Profesiina etyka bukhhaltera i audytora. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu ta analizu. 2015. № 1(31). S. 156–164.

Antle R. Auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research. 1984. Vol. 22. No. 1. Pp. 1–20.

Asbaugh H., LaFond R., Mayhew B. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review. 2003. Vol. 78. Issue 3. Pp. 611–639.

Beattie V., Feamley S. Auditor independence and nonaudit services: a literature review (working paper). Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). 2004. URL: http://www.icaew.co.uk (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Craswell A.T., Stokes D., Laughton J. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2002. Vol. 33, Issue 2. Pp. 253–275.

Canning M., Gwilliam D. Non-audit services and auditor independence: Some evidence from Ireland. The European Accounting Review. 1999. N. 3(3). 1999. URL: 401-419. dx.doi.org/10.1080/096381899335853 (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Craswell A. T., Stokes D., Laughton J. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2002. Vol. 33, Issue 2. Pp. 253–275.

Vaicekauskas D. Differences between audit quality provided by international and local audit firms: the research on audit clients perceptions i the audit market of Lithuania. Ekonomika. 2014. Pp. 157–173. URL: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1644448235/fulltext/AF20F1E7C91E442APQ/41?accountid=17203 (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Brandon D. M., Crabtree A. D., Maher J. J. Nonaudit fees, auditor independence, and bond ratings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2004. Vol. 23. No. 2. Pp. 89–103.

Gul F. A., Jaggi B. L., Krishnan G. V. Auditor independence: evidence on the joint effects of auditor tenure and nonaudit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2007. Vol. 26, Issue 2. Pp. 117–142.

Zhang B., Emanuel D. The provision of non-audit services and earnings conservatism: Do New Zealand auditors compromise their independence? Accounting Research Journal. 2008. Pp. 195-221. URL: http://search.proquest.¬com/docview/214448303/fulltext/4FDA5C5E3FF34D0APQ/11?accountid=17203 (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Schmidt J. J. Perceived Auditor independence and audit litigation: the role of nonaudit services fees. The Accounting Review. 2012, May. URL: http://aaajournals.org/loi/ajpt. (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Callaghan J., Parkash M., Singhal R. Going concern audit opinions and the provision of nonaudit services: implications for auditor endependence of Bankrupt firms. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2009, May. Vol. 28. No. 1.

Nouri H., Lombardi D. Auditors independence: an analysis of Montgomerys auditing textbooks in the 20th century. The Accounting Historians Journal. 2009. Pp. 81–112. URL: http://search.proquest.com/docview/523047361/fulltext/B411C273108D4269PQ/22?accountid=17203 (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Manko N. F. Zahrozy nezalezhnosti audytorskoho sudzhennia pry vykonanni zavdan z nadannia vpevnenosti. Stratehiia rozvytku audytu v umovakh hlobalizatsii ekonomichnykh vidnosyn : tezy dop. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 31 bereznia-1 kvitnia 2016 roku) / vidp. red. A. A. Mazaraki. Kyiv : Kyiv. nats. torh.-ekonom. un-t, 2016. S. 39–41.

Okaro S. C., Okafor G. O. Joint Provision of Audit and Non-Audit Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Study. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices. 2014. Pp. 30–45. URL: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1511117268/fulltext/4FDA5C5E3FF34D0APQ/136?accountid=17203 (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Öhman P. and Eva Wallerstedt. Audit regulation and the development of the auditing profession: The case of Sweden. Accounting History. 2012. Rr. 241–257.

Shalimova N. S. Audyt ta inshi posluhy: problemy zabezpechennia nezalezhnosti audytoriv. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 2010. № 8. S. 25–28. URL: http://www. irbis-nbuv.gov.ua (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

BameAldred C. W., Brandon D. M., Messier Jr. W. F., Rittenberg L. E., Stefaniak C. M. A summary of research on external auditor reliance on the internal audit function. Auditing: a Journal of Practice & Theory. May 2013, Vol. 32. No. Supplement 1 (2013). Pp. 251–286. URL: http://aaajournals.org/loi/ajpt (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Antonyuk E. Diversification of audit services as a way to improve the effectiveness of auditing company. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences. Poland, Swinoujscie. 2016. № 1 (3). R. 55–63. URL: https://ijoness.com/resources/html/cms/MAINPAGE (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Antonyuk E. Issues and proposals for the improvement of standartization of audit services. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences. Poland, Swinoujscie. 2015. № 2 (2). R. 114–119. URL: https://ijoness.com/resources/html/-cms/MAINPAGE (data zvernennia: 20.02.2020).

Issue

Section

Статьи